Civil QA/QC Brief

25-0608 Lot 22R Market Place II Ph3

6128 Highway 5, Bryant, Arkansas | Review of Sheet C-1.0 Preliminary Site Plan
Date 06/05/2026
Prepared For Jeremy Ventress Review
Primary Conclusion Not permit-ready as submitted
Main Risk Incomplete civil support, not an obvious face-of-sheet boundary failure

Executive Summary

The biggest issue is plan incompleteness. Based on the submitted preliminary site plan, the project does not yet show enough information to verify drainage/stormwater compliance, Highway 5 access permitting, ADA layout compliance, and utility coordination. Boundary risk appears lower than the civil design risk, but the sheet alone is still not enough to fully close out easement and title impacts.

The current package reads like an early site planning sheet rather than a full civil permit package. Parking quantity does not appear to be the main problem. The key problem is that major compliance items are either missing or not documented at a level that supports agency or permit review.

Key Findings

Severity Issue Location Recommended Fix
High Drainage and stormwater design are not adequately documented. Entire site, especially the building pad and Highway 5 frontage. Add grading and drainage sheets with spot grades, flow arrows, inlets, pipe sizes, rim and invert data, outfall tie-ins, and signed/sealed drainage calculations.
High Highway frontage access and ditch work are not tied to agency approval. Highway 5 / Old Stagecoach Road frontage and driveway entrance area. Add ARDOT permit reference, driveway geometry, frontage grading tie-in, and any ditch or culvert sizing and flowline data tied to the access work.
Medium-High ADA parking and accessible route cannot be fully verified. Accessible stalls and route to the building entrance. Add a dedicated ADA detail showing stall widths, aisle widths, van designation, signage, slopes, curb-ramp connection, and the full accessible route.
Medium Utility design is too incomplete to confirm constructability and review compliance. Water, sewer, fire, and service connections throughout the site. Add proposed utility routing, sizes, materials, service connection points, fire service scope, invert and rim data where applicable, and utility conflict notes.
Medium Boundary and easement verification are not fully supportable from the sheet alone. Property lines, easement areas, and frontage dedication areas. Pair the plan with the sealed boundary survey, title commitment, recorded plat, and all easement instruments before final approval.
Medium Sidewalk detail contains an internal drafting inconsistency. Sidewalk detail note block. Recheck the concrete strength callout. The shown 400 PSI note appears likely to be a drafting error and should be corrected before issuance.
Low Title block and contact data are incomplete. Lower-right title block. Complete owner and developer contact fields and confirm issuance status before external submittal.

Recommended Next-Step Package

Prepared from the submitted preliminary site plan and civil QA/QC review notes on 06/05/2026. This brief does not include graphic redlines placed directly on the source plan sheet.